Treaty of Banning

1. Admins CANNOT ban those who disagree with them on an opinion and must allow others to have different opinions. This means admins like Chicken10 cannot ban those who dislike Green Steve, and those like MasterFrown0704 cannot ban users such as EnderChas over disagreements.

2. Polls to debate on bans/demotions cannot be put up. Such polls are considered public embarrassment, since they tell others negative things about the users who have been considered for banning/demotion. If admins do insist on putting up such polls, then they must list some good things the user has done as well.

3. Users cannot be kicked/banned from chat without a valid reason. If a user asks a moderator/admin why they were kicked/banned, the moderator/admin must give a valid explanation. If the moderator/admin fails to provide an explanation within 24 hours after being asked for it, they may risk demotion.

4. If a banned user asks/begs to be unbanned or have their block shortened, admins cannot ignore them and must negotiate with the said user. Not doing so could risk demotion. Remember, if a user wants their block modified, they should supply good reason(s) on why the block should be reconsidered.

Here are my four suggestions. Leave your opinions on them below.